Learn how the MR industry can re-build respondent relationships and fight disengagement in a time of fierce online competition. Read Rules of Engagement by Kees de Jong, SSI CEO, in Research World.
Read Simon Chadwick's interview on the "Future of Insight." Then log in and join the discussion!
GfK NOP Embraces Research Voice "The most important challenge...is how to meet people in a progressive research atmosphere..." Mike Cooke, Global Director: Online Development. Read more.


Comments
Having done focus groups with participants, we know that some feel a sincere desire to contribute, or are flattered to be asked to help design a new product, or are curious about what questions they're going to be asked when they start a new survey, or find the process entertaining. Probably because we see so many awful, tediuous surveys, we've become far too cynical about the motives and characters of people who want to take part in research; we find it hard to believe that any reasonable, sincere person would do so. But the evidence is there in the millions of questionnaires that are reliably completed with no reward, and in focus group comments, that sincere, reasonable people do want to offer their opinions. We should moderate our jaded perspective when thinking about and communicating with participants.
It would be very interesting, no doubt about it for me at leat, to see if there is a difference between the response rate boosted with points/cash incentives or with prize draws. I believe we should avoid to turn this activity, of completing surveys, into a job, by focusing on incentives of any type. Like Jackie says, there are people who are really interested in making a difference. We should act on emphasizing this aspect of taking surveys. That you can actually influence a big company to develop a products that you need/like. Just tell us what you think/like about this product. The benefits of this would be on a long term: a better product, a better life style, better health...